The Morbi Suspension Bridge Collapse
A 143-year-old British-era pedestrian suspension bridge reopened for a festival weekend on rusted cables and no engineering sign-off. It collapsed under the crowd it was sold as safe for, killing 135 people. Four years on, no charges have been framed and the trial has not begun.
The Promise
โThe bridge has been renovated and made safe for the public; it can bear the load of visitors during the festival season.โ
โ Oreva Group (Ajanta Manufacturing Pvt Ltd), Private clock-and-electronics company awarded a 15-year contract by Morbi Municipality to operate, maintain and collect ticket revenue from the bridge ยท 26 October 2022
Oreva reopened the bridge on 26 October 2022, in time for Diwali and Gujarati New Year, after a roughly seven-month renovation, without obtaining a structural fitness or load-bearing certificate from any competent authority, and sold tickets for entry without any cap on the number of people allowed on the bridge at once.
The Standard
A public suspension bridge reopened to paying visitors only after structural renovation is certified by qualified engineers, with a maximum-occupancy limit enforced and administered under a valid, monitored municipal contract.
Standard municipal public-safety obligations for structures open to the public, and the terms of the Morbi Municipality's own maintenance contract with Oreva.
In force from 26 October 2022
The Reality
On the evening of 30 October 2022, the bridge โ packed with an estimated 300-plus people, several times any safe limit โ snapped and collapsed into the Machchhu river, killing 135 people including many women and children. A forensic examination found the original 19th-century steel suspension cables had simply been cleaned and repainted rather than replaced, along with rusted anchor pins and loose flooring bolts; no structural or load-safety audit had been carried out before reopening, and the renovation contractors engaged were not qualified structural engineers. Ten people, including Oreva Group managing director Jaysukh Patel, were chargesheeted with culpable homicide not amounting to murder and other offences in a more than 1,200-page charge sheet. As of mid-2026, formal charges have still not been framed by the Morbi sessions court and the trial has not begun; the court has rejected discharge applications from the accused, and the Gujarat High Court has declined demands for a CBI probe.
As of 1 June 2026
The Gap
Bars share a single zero-based scale. No axis truncation is used to exaggerate or minimize the gap between the two figures.
Timeline
- AnnouncementBridge reopens after renovation
Oreva Group reopened the bridge to the public in time for Diwali and Gujarati New Year without a structural safety certificate.
- StatusBridge collapses
The suspension bridge, overloaded with visitors, snapped and fell into the Machchhu river, killing 135 people.
- StatusFirst arrests made
Gujarat police arrested Oreva Group managers, ticket clerks and security staff on charges including culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
- StatusOreva MD Jaysukh Patel surrenders
Jaysukh Patel, the Oreva Group managing director, surrendered before a Morbi court and was sent into judicial custody.
- StatusChargesheet filed
Police filed a more than 1,200-page chargesheet naming ten accused, including Jaysukh Patel, citing a forensic report that found rusted cables and unqualified repair contractors.
- DelayCharges still not framed
More than three years after the chargesheet, the Morbi sessions court had yet to frame formal charges; the trial was expected to begin only around mid-2026.
Legal Status
Ten people were chargesheeted with culpable homicide not amounting to murder and related offences. No charges have yet been formally framed by the trial court and no trial has begun; all ten remain presumed innocent.
Chargesheeted as the tenth accused; surrendered and was jailed in January 2023; case still pre-trial as of 2026.
Chargesheeted alongside Patel; case still pre-trial as of 2026.
Verdict
That the bridge was reopened without a safety certificate, on unreplaced 19th-century cables, and that this caused the collapse, is not seriously disputed โ it is confirmed by the state's own forensic report and chargesheet. What remains completely unresolved, more than three and a half years on, is any judicial accountability: no charges have been framed and no trial has started.
The chain of events, the forensic findings on cable and structural failure, and the chargesheet are well documented by multiple independent Indian outlets and have not been seriously contested. The prolonged pre-trial delay is confirmed by contemporaneous 2026 court reporting.
What remains incomplete
- No trial has begun as of the most recent reporting reviewed (mid-2026); this investigation cannot report a verdict or sentence for any of the ten accused.
- Civil compensation amounts paid to victims' families by the Gujarat government and Oreva Group vary across sources and were not independently reconciled here.
- Whether Morbi Municipality officials who awarded or oversaw the maintenance contract face separate departmental or criminal liability was not conclusively established in sources reviewed.
Sources
Related investigations
The Amrapali Group Homebuyers Fraud
Amrapali Group took money from over 40,000 homebuyers for Noida and Greater Noida flats, then diverted thousands of crores of that money into unrelated ventures while construction stalled for years. The Supreme Court eventually cancelled the group's RERA registration and handed its projects to state-run NBCC to finish.
The Jaypee Infratech Insolvency and Homebuyers Case
Jaypee Infratech sold flats to over 20,000 homebuyers along the Yamuna Expressway, then defaulted on bank loans and entered insolvency in 2017. It took nearly seven years, a Supreme Court intervention, and two competing bidding rounds before the Suraksha Group finally took over the company in 2024 โ with many buyers still waiting more than 15 years for possession.
The Unitech Group Homebuyers Fraud
Unitech collected over Rs 14,000 crore from nearly 30,000 homebuyers for flats it never finished, while a Supreme Court-ordered audit found its promoters had diverted thousands of crores abroad. The Chandra brothers spent years in jail, the government took over the company's board, and thousands of buyers are still waiting for their homes.