KNOWBASE
KB-3021Disputed Facts

The Kodaikanal Mercury Poisoning Case

A Hindustan Unilever thermometer factory dumped mercury-laced glass waste in a hill-town scrapyard and nearby forest for years. Workers say it killed dozens; the company denies any employee was harmed. A settlement finally came after 15 years — with no admission of liability.

Natural ResourcesPublished 9 September 2026Updated 9 September 2026
~300 tonnes
of mercury-contaminated waste later shipped out of Kodaikanal for disposal after the factory's closure
Share on XShare on WhatsApp
01

The Promise

The factory's operations, including handling of mercury used to manufacture thermometers, met applicable safety and environmental standards.

Hindustan Unilever Limited (then Hindustan Lever Limited), Operator of the mercury thermometer factory in Kodaikanal, Tamil Nadu, set up in the 1980s to manufacture thermometers largely for export · 1 January 1983

The factory made glass mercury thermometers in the hill town of Kodaikanal from the 1980s. Contract workers handled broken glass thermometer waste without adequate protective equipment, and factory waste was found dumped in a scrapyard near a school and in nearby forest land.

02

The Standard

Mercury, a well-documented neurotoxin, handled and disposed of according to hazardous-waste safety norms, with no worker exposure and no environmental contamination of surrounding forest or water sources.

Standard occupational-safety and hazardous-waste-handling norms applicable to mercury processing.

In force from 1 January 1983

03

The Reality

In March 2001, mercury-laced glass waste from the factory was discovered dumped in a scrapyard near a Kodaikanal school, prompting Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board action and the factory's closure that year. The company subsequently exported nearly 300 tonnes of mercury-contaminated waste to the United States for recycling. A workers' group representing roughly 600 former contract employees said mercury poisoning had killed 45 workers and 18 family members over more than three decades of the factory's operation; Hindustan Unilever has disputed this, acknowledging some contamination at the site but denying that any employee was harmed by mercury exposure. After a nearly 15-year legal and public campaign, the company reached a settlement with around 591 former workers and their families in 2016, providing payments for livelihood and health support, without accepting legal liability for the alleged deaths or illnesses.

As of 1 January 2016

04

The Gap

05

Timeline

  1. Announcement
    Factory begins mercury thermometer production

    Hindustan Lever Limited's Kodaikanal unit began manufacturing glass mercury thermometers, largely for export.

  2. Status
    Mercury waste found near school

    Mercury-contaminated glass waste from the factory was discovered dumped in a local scrapyard, triggering regulatory scrutiny.

  3. Status
    Factory shut down

    The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board ordered the factory closed following the discovery.

  4. Status
    Contaminated waste exported for recycling

    The company shipped nearly 300 tonnes of mercury waste from the site to the United States.

  5. Status
    Settlement reached with former workers

    Hindustan Unilever settled with around 591 former workers and their families for an undisclosed amount, without admitting legal liability for alleged health impacts.

06

Legal Status

This was resolved through a private, out-of-court settlement rather than a court verdict or criminal conviction. Hindustan Unilever has never admitted legal liability for the alleged worker deaths, and no criminal case against any individual has been reported.

07

Verdict

Disputed FactsMedium confidence

That the factory dumped mercury-contaminated waste improperly and that contamination existed at the site is not disputed — the company itself has acknowledged this. What remains genuinely contested is the human cost: whether mercury exposure caused the deaths and illnesses a workers' group attributes to it, a claim the company denies and no court or independent inquiry has definitively settled.

The factory closure, waste dumping, and 2016 settlement are well documented by multiple independent sources. The disputed death toll rests on competing claims from the workers' group and the company, with no independent epidemiological finding located that resolves the disagreement.

08

What remains incomplete

  • The exact settlement amount paid to former workers in 2016 was not disclosed publicly and could not be independently verified here.
  • No independent epidemiological study resolving the disputed death toll (workers' group claim of 45 deaths vs. the company's denial) was located.
  • Long-term environmental monitoring data for the site after the 2003 waste removal was not independently reviewed here.
09

Sources

Independent source1 January 2023
Kodaikanal mercury poisoning
Wikipedia
View source
Independent source1 January 2016
Unilever India settles mercury poisoning claims with workers
Philippine Daily Inquirer (Reuters)
View source
Independent source1 January 2021
After 15-year legal battle, HUL pays mercury-exposed workers in Kodaikanal; waste sent to US
Land Conflict Watch
View source

Related investigations

#1 · KB-001Convicted

The Coal Block Allocation Scam ("Coalgate")

218 coal blocks handed out without competitive bidding. The CAG's own loss estimate swung from ₹10.67 lakh crore to ₹1.86 lakh crore before the Supreme Court cancelled most of the allocations outright.

204 of 218
coal block allocations cancelled by the Supreme Court as illegal
Natural Resources
#15 · KB-048Wrongdoing Confirmed

The Odisha Illegal Mining Scam

A government-appointed commission found nearly 23 crore tonnes of iron and manganese ore extracted illegally over a decade, worth an estimated ₹60,000 crore — implicating some of India's biggest steel and mining companies.

22.8 cr tonnes
of iron and manganese ore the Shah Commission found illegally extracted
Natural Resources
#44 · KB-2506Wrongdoing Confirmed

The Green Revolution Made India Food Self-Sufficient. Six Decades On, Punjab's Water Table Is Paying the Bill

India's Green Revolution of the 1960s and 70s was framed as the answer to famine and food-grain dependence -- high-yield seeds, irrigation and fertiliser to make the country self-sufficient. It largely delivered that goal, transforming India into a major food producer and exporter. But the same package of practices, concentrated heavily in Punjab, Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh, has been linked by decades of subsequent research to severe groundwater depletion, soil degradation and regional inequality that policymakers are still grappling with.

117 of 150
Administrative sub-units (blocks) in Punjab where groundwater extraction exceeds recharge, per the Central Ground Water Board, in the state at the heart of the Green Revolution
Natural Resources