KNOWBASE
KB-024Convicted

The Fodder Scam

Government treasuries in undivided Bihar paid out for animal feed, medicine, and equipment that were never actually purchased — a scheme running for years before raids exposed it, and one that eventually sent the state's sitting Chief Minister to prison, across five separate cases.

Public SpendingPublished 7 September 2026Updated 7 September 2026
₹950 cr
fraudulently withdrawn from Bihar's animal husbandry treasuries
Share on XShare on WhatsApp
01

The Promise

Funds disbursed from state treasuries for the Animal Husbandry Department will be spent on genuine purchases of fodder, medicine, and livestock-related equipment.

Government of Bihar, Animal Husbandry Department, State government department administering livestock-support spending · 1 January 1996

Over roughly a decade, officials and contractors are alleged to have fraudulently withdrawn funds from district treasuries across undivided Bihar (including areas now in Jharkhand) using fake bills for supplies that were never delivered.

02

The Standard

Treasury disbursements made only against genuine, verified purchases and deliveries, following standard state government financial controls.

Standard treasury and financial-control rules governing state government departmental spending.

In force from 1 January 1996

03

The Reality

Investigations found roughly ₹950 crore fraudulently withdrawn from treasuries in districts including Chaibasa, Deoghar, Dumka, and Doranda. Then-Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav was named as an accused and has been convicted multiple times across different treasury cases, with combined sentences across four cases reported at 14 years, plus a further 5-year sentence and ₹60 lakh fine in a fifth case (the Doranda treasury case) in 2022. The Supreme Court has separately heard appeals concerning suspension of sentences in the case.

As of 21 February 2022

04

The Gap

05

Timeline

  1. Status
    Raids expose the scam

    Raids on Animal Husbandry Department offices uncover the scale of fraudulent withdrawals.

  2. Status
    First conviction

    Lalu Prasad Yadav is convicted in the Chaibasa treasury case, among the first of several.

  3. Status
    Doranda case conviction

    A special CBI court sentences Yadav to five years and a ₹60 lakh fine in the fifth and largest treasury case.

  4. Status
    Supreme Court hears sentence-suspension appeals

    The Court considers CBI appeals against a Jharkhand High Court order suspending sentences in the case.

06

Legal Status

This is a stub entry. Lalu Prasad Yadav has been convicted across multiple separate treasury cases within the broader scam; this investigation has not yet compiled a complete, case-by-case account of every conviction, sentence, and appeal outcome.

Lalu Prasad YadavNamed in 2 cases
Chief Minister of Bihar at the time of the scheme

Convicted across multiple separate treasury cases, with combined sentencing reported at 14 years across four cases plus a further 5 years and a ₹60 lakh fine in a fifth (Doranda) case, 2022. Appeals concerning sentence suspension have continued.

07

Verdict

ConvictedMedium confidence

Preliminary verdict, pending fuller research: this is one of the more clearly adjudicated cases on this site — multiple criminal convictions across several separate treasury cases are a matter of court record. This investigation has not yet compiled a complete, reconciled account of every case, sentence, and current appeal status.

The convictions themselves are well documented and consistently reported. Confidence is not marked higher only because this entry has not yet fully reconciled the multiple separate treasury cases into one complete account.

08

What remains incomplete

  • This is a stub entry. A complete, case-by-case account of every treasury case, conviction, and sentence has not yet been compiled.
  • The current status of appeals against sentence suspension, including the Supreme Court proceedings noted above, has not been resolved in this entry.
  • Other named co-accused beyond Lalu Prasad Yadav have not been detailed here.
09

Sources

Independent source1 January 2017
Lalu Prasad Yadav Convicted In Fodder Scam: 5 Facts To Know
Outlook India
View source
Independent source21 February 2022
Lalu Prasad Yadav sentenced to five years in jail in fifth fodder scam case
Business Standard
View source
Independent source1 April 2026
Supreme Court To Hear CBI's Appeal Against Suspension Of Lalu Prasad Yadav's Sentence
LiveLaw
View source

Related investigations

#16 · KB-150Under Trial

The Amrapali Group Homebuyers Fraud

Amrapali Group took money from over 40,000 homebuyers for Noida and Greater Noida flats, then diverted thousands of crores of that money into unrelated ventures while construction stalled for years. The Supreme Court eventually cancelled the group's RERA registration and handed its projects to state-run NBCC to finish.

42,000+
homebuyers left without possession of flats they had paid for, at the center of the Supreme Court's Amrapali Group case
Public Spending
#17 · KB-152Wrongdoing Confirmed

The Jaypee Infratech Insolvency and Homebuyers Case

Jaypee Infratech sold flats to over 20,000 homebuyers along the Yamuna Expressway, then defaulted on bank loans and entered insolvency in 2017. It took nearly seven years, a Supreme Court intervention, and two competing bidding rounds before the Suraksha Group finally took over the company in 2024 — with many buyers still waiting more than 15 years for possession.

22,000+
homebuyers left waiting, some for over a decade, as Jaypee Infratech's flats along the Yamuna Expressway remained unfinished through years of insolvency proceedings
Public Spending
#18 · KB-151Under Trial

The Unitech Group Homebuyers Fraud

Unitech collected over Rs 14,000 crore from nearly 30,000 homebuyers for flats it never finished, while a Supreme Court-ordered audit found its promoters had diverted thousands of crores abroad. The Chandra brothers spent years in jail, the government took over the company's board, and thousands of buyers are still waiting for their homes.

29,800
homebuyers from whom Unitech had collected roughly Rs 14,270 crore, per a Supreme Court-ordered audit, for flats not delivered on time
Public Spending