The Delhi Excise Policy Case
A liquor licensing policy was withdrawn amid allegations that it was designed to funnel kickbacks to a group of favoured liquor businesses. Years of arrests and headlines later, a trial court discharged every accused, finding no evidence the CBI's case could actually support.
The Promise
“Delhi's new excise policy will end the cartelisation of liquor licences, increase government revenue, and be implemented transparently.”
— Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi, under the Aam Aadmi Party, State government implementing a new liquor retail licensing regime · 17 November 2021
Delhi's Excise Policy 2021-22 restructured liquor retail licensing; it was withdrawn in mid-2022 after allegations that its design favoured a group of private liquor businesses referred to in the case as the 'South Group,' in exchange for kickbacks.
The Standard
A licensing policy designed and implemented without favouritism toward specific private parties, and without kickbacks influencing its terms.
Standard public procurement and policy-making norms requiring transparent, non-discriminatory treatment of private parties.
In force from 17 November 2021
The Reality
The CBI and ED alleged the policy was designed to benefit the 'South Group' in exchange for illegal gratification quantified at roughly ₹90–100 crore, and arrested Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia in February 2023 and Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in March 2024, among others. On 27 February 2026, a trial court discharged Kejriwal, Sisodia, and 21 others, finding the CBI had failed to substantiate its allegations with credible evidence and that no prima facie case of criminal conspiracy existed. The CBI has filed a revision petition in the Delhi High Court challenging the discharge, which was pending as of the most recent reporting reviewed.
As of 9 March 2026
The Gap
Bars share a single zero-based scale. No axis truncation is used to exaggerate or minimize the gap between the two figures.
Timeline
- AnnouncementNew excise policy takes effect
Delhi's restructured liquor licensing regime begins.
- StatusPolicy withdrawn
The Delhi government scraps the policy amid allegations of irregularities.
- StatusCBI registers FIR
The agency opens a criminal case over the policy's formulation.
- StatusManish Sisodia arrested
The Deputy Chief Minister is arrested by the CBI.
- StatusArvind Kejriwal arrested
The Chief Minister is arrested by the ED.
- StatusSisodia granted bail
The Supreme Court grants him bail after roughly 17 months in custody.
- StatusAll 23 accused discharged
A trial court finds the CBI's case does not survive judicial scrutiny and discharges everyone named.
- StatusCBI challenges the discharge
The Delhi High Court issues notice on the CBI's revision petition against the discharge order.
Legal Status
As of publication, every person named in this case has been discharged by the trial court, which found the prosecution's evidence insufficient even to proceed to trial. That finding is being challenged by the CBI and is not yet final.
Arrested March 2024; discharged by the trial court, February 2026, which found no prima facie evidence against him. CBI revision petition against the discharge pending.
Arrested February 2023; granted bail August 2024 after roughly 17 months in custody; discharged by the trial court, February 2026. CBI revision petition pending.
Verdict
This case's most important fact, and one easy to miss in year-old headlines, is its most recent development: a trial court did not merely acquit the accused after a trial — it discharged all 23 of them, finding the CBI's evidence insufficient to even proceed, and explicitly rebuked the agency's case. That finding is under challenge and not final, but as of publication it is the actual legal status, and this site reports it as such rather than defaulting to the more dramatic, better-known arrest narrative.
The discharge order and the CBI's pending challenge to it are both documented in contemporaneous legal reporting. Confidence is not higher only because the matter remains open pending the High Court's ruling on the CBI's revision petition, and this investigation has not reviewed the discharge order's full text directly.
What remains incomplete
- The Delhi High Court had not ruled on the CBI's revision petition against the discharge as of this entry's publication.
- The ED's separate money-laundering case, and its current status relative to the CBI matter's discharge, has not been fully detailed here.
- This investigation has not reviewed the trial court's discharge order directly, relying instead on legal-affairs reporting of its content.
Sources
Related investigations
The Amrapali Group Homebuyers Fraud
Amrapali Group took money from over 40,000 homebuyers for Noida and Greater Noida flats, then diverted thousands of crores of that money into unrelated ventures while construction stalled for years. The Supreme Court eventually cancelled the group's RERA registration and handed its projects to state-run NBCC to finish.
The Jaypee Infratech Insolvency and Homebuyers Case
Jaypee Infratech sold flats to over 20,000 homebuyers along the Yamuna Expressway, then defaulted on bank loans and entered insolvency in 2017. It took nearly seven years, a Supreme Court intervention, and two competing bidding rounds before the Suraksha Group finally took over the company in 2024 — with many buyers still waiting more than 15 years for possession.
The Unitech Group Homebuyers Fraud
Unitech collected over Rs 14,000 crore from nearly 30,000 homebuyers for flats it never finished, while a Supreme Court-ordered audit found its promoters had diverted thousands of crores abroad. The Chandra brothers spent years in jail, the government took over the company's board, and thousands of buyers are still waiting for their homes.